<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History: The Cold War (Heinemann Baccalaureate) &#8211; Keely Rogers &amp; Jo Thomas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibdamned.com/history-the-cold-war-keely-rogers-jo-thomas/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibdamned.com/history-the-cold-war-keely-rogers-jo-thomas</link>
	<description>IB Textbooks Reviewed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ibdamned.com/history-the-cold-war-keely-rogers-jo-thomas/comment-page-1#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibdamned.com/?p=74#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Contrary to the first reviewer, this book is decent but by no means does it deserve five stars. 

The book is way too basic. It gives you a lot of content but there is practically no analysis there. The historiography is flimsy at best, and doesn&#039;t add to your understanding of Cold War historiography. It&#039;s easy to flip through and get a very basic comprehension of what happened from 1945-1985 but really there are much better books out there. If you are writing essays, get your main understanding from this book, but getting a 6 by only reading this book is a push, and a 7 is not possible unless you read something more analytical. 

My advice is that you might as well get it but you shouldn&#039;t depend on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrary to the first reviewer, this book is decent but by no means does it deserve five stars. </p>
<p>The book is way too basic. It gives you a lot of content but there is practically no analysis there. The historiography is flimsy at best, and doesn&#8217;t add to your understanding of Cold War historiography. It&#8217;s easy to flip through and get a very basic comprehension of what happened from 1945-1985 but really there are much better books out there. If you are writing essays, get your main understanding from this book, but getting a 6 by only reading this book is a push, and a 7 is not possible unless you read something more analytical. </p>
<p>My advice is that you might as well get it but you shouldn&#8217;t depend on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
